SOCI Act ComplianceCritical infrastructure obligations, explained
SOCI Act Compliance › Guidance notes
Guidance note

SOCI Act penalties and enforcement: what non-compliance can cost

Last reviewed 2026-11-14

Summary

Most SOCI Act duties carry civil penalties: 200 penalty units for CIRMP failures, 150 for the annual report and 50 for cyber incident reporting, and a court can order a company to pay up to five times that. Records showing controls in operation, such as dated hardware inspection records, help an entity respond if the regulator asks.

The SOCI Act enforces its obligations mainly through civil penalties rather than criminal offences. This guide lists the maximums, converts them to dollars on current figures, and explains how the regulator can act.

1.Maximum penalties by obligation

ObligationSectionPenalty unitsIndividualBody corporate
Adopt and maintain a CIRMP30AC200$72,800$364,000
Comply with the CIRMP30AD200$72,800$364,000
Review the CIRMP regularly30AE200$72,800$364,000
Keep the CIRMP up to date30AF200$72,800$364,000
Have regard to the Rules when adopting, reviewing or varying the CIRMP30AKA200$72,800$364,000
Give the annual report30AG150$54,600$273,000
Comply with a direction to vary the CIRMP30AI250$91,000$455,000
Report a critical cyber security incident within 12 hours30BC50$18,200$91,000
Report another cyber security incident within 72 hours30BD50$18,200$91,000
Give initial register information2350$18,200$91,000
Notify register events within 30 days2450$18,200$91,000
Tell a data storage or processing provider that it handles business critical data12F(3)50$18,200$91,000

Dollar figures use $364 per penalty unit and, for companies, the five-times multiplier explained below. They are the maximums a court may order, not fixed fines.

2.What a penalty unit is worth

The Crimes (Amount of a Penalty Unit) Instrument 2026 sets a Commonwealth penalty unit at $364 from 1 July 2026, as indexed under section 4AA of the Crimes Act 1914. The instrument notes that the amount applies to offences committed on or after 1 July 2026, so the figure for a given contravention depends on when the conduct occurred. Section 82(5) of the Regulatory Powers (Standard Provisions) Act 2014 caps the penalty a court can order at five times the specified amount for a body corporate, and at the specified amount for anyone else.

3.How the Act is enforced

Part 5 of the SOCI Act applies the standard Commonwealth regulatory toolkit to every civil penalty provision:

In setting a penalty, a court must take into account the nature and extent of the contravention, any loss or damage it caused, the circumstances in which it occurred, and whether the person has previously been found to have engaged in similar conduct (Regulatory Powers Act section 82(6)).

4.Rules that shape the outcome

Several provisions of the Regulatory Powers Act and the SOCI Act affect how far exposure can run:

Separately, CISC's SOCI Act page warns that it is an offence to disclose protected information about critical infrastructure assets, even for a responsible entity, unless the disclosure complies with the Act. That matters when sharing CIRMP material with consultants, auditors and suppliers.

5.Directions to fix a program

If a relevant official is satisfied that a CIRMP has a serious deficiency, meaning one that poses a material risk to national security, the defence of Australia, or the social or economic stability of Australia or its people, the official may direct the entity to vary it (section 30AI). The entity must first be given notice and 14 days to make a written submission, the direction must allow at least 14 days to vary the program, and failing to comply carries up to 250 penalty units. The direction and the resulting changes must then be set out in the next annual report.

6.How the regulator says it will act

CISC's SOCI Act page says that from 2026-27 it is changing its compliance posture in response to the threat environment and the 2026 review of the Act. It will continue education and awareness work with regulated entities, while focusing on measures to address potential or identified non-compliance. That review, by Dr Jill Slay AM, recommended moving from a "light touch" approach focused on administration and documentation to a penalty-based risk management process with real enforcement of penalties (Recommendation 2 of the final report).

7.Proposed increase to 500 penalty units

Measure 16 in the Home Affairs consultation paper proposed raising the maximum for selected core preventive and assurance duties, including having, complying with, reviewing and updating a CIRMP, from 200 to 500 penalty units. Routine reporting, entity-change notifications and cyber incident notification would stay at their current levels. Consultation closed on 31 July 2026, and the change is not law.

8.Reducing exposure in practice

General information, not legal advice. Based on the SOCI Act, Compilation No. 9 (4 June 2026), and the Regulatory Powers (Standard Provisions) Act 2014, Compilation No. 4.

Questions and answers

What is the maximum penalty for not having a CIRMP?
200 penalty units. At $364 a unit that is $72,800 for an individual, and a court can order a body corporate to pay up to five times that, or $364,000.
Can the regulator issue a penalty without going to court?
Yes. Every civil penalty provision of the SOCI Act can be the subject of an infringement notice under the Regulatory Powers Act. Larger penalties require a court order.
Is the CIRMP penalty going up to 500 penalty units?
It has been proposed. The Home Affairs consultation paper on a second tranche of SOCI reforms proposed the increase, but it is not law.
How long does the regulator have to bring proceedings?
An application for a civil penalty order must be made within six years of the alleged contravention, under section 82(2) of the Regulatory Powers Act.

Other guidance notes